Quote from: LoyceV on September 04, 2018, 06:58:41 PM

suchmoon1, suchmoon2, suchmoon3 Cheesy

What's with everybody linking the same Rick Astley's song? I know I am missing out on something, not sure what it is.

Quote from: marlboroza on September 04, 2018, 09:02:48 PM

Quote from: bill gator on September 04, 2018, 07:07:17 PM

I hadn't even considered the certain campaigns that require at least 1 merit, and look at that, Eroiy is one of them... You've convinced me, even if you weren't intending to, that OP had the intentions to abuse. Sending 1-merit to your alt and then enrolling that alt in a campaign that requires at least 1-merit, and you had not received any merit previously..

They were accepted to campaign on January 26., while they've sent merit on February 2.
Well, I can't argue on this one, they used that merit to receive higher payment - somehow I missed it.
I really wonder how that happened, with all these information from reference links (2 PM's with different signatures, wrong connection in known alts Roll Eyes

)

Quote from: bill gator on September 04, 2018, 05:39:41 PM

OP is being misleading about their situation though, because suggesting that you were tagged for simply having an alt account is incorrect.

Actually, reference to OP's feedback was pointing to this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg36254804#msg36254804 and he was tagged for this. TP changed feedback to merit abuse after pointed that connection is not good.

And after all this you pointed they sent merit because there was merit requirement for that campaign, I believe everyone in this topic missed that part.

Fair enough, its up to TP and yahoo if they want to leave negative or not. 0.0005BTC wasn't a lot at that time, but still it maybe a reason for merit abuse.