Quote from: bill gator on September 04, 2018, 07:07:17 PM

I hadn't even considered the certain campaigns that require at least 1 merit, and look at that, Eroiy is one of them... You've convinced me, even if you weren't intending to, that OP had the intentions to abuse. Sending 1-merit to your alt and then enrolling that alt in a campaign that requires at least 1-merit, and you had not received any merit previously..

They were accepted to campaign on January 26., while they've sent merit on February 9.
Well, I can't argue on this one, they used that merit to receive higher payment - somehow I missed it.
I really wonder how that happened, with all these information from reference links (2 PM's with different signatures, wrong connection in known alts Roll Eyes

)

Quote from: bill gator on September 04, 2018, 05:39:41 PM

OP is being misleading about their situation though, because suggesting that you were tagged for simply having an alt account is incorrect.

Actually, reference to OP's feedback was pointing to this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg36254804#msg36254804 and he was tagged for this. TP changed feedback to merit abuse after pointed that connection is not good.

And after all this you pointed they sent merit because there was merit requirement for that campaign, I believe everyone in this topic missed that part.

I have to edit this:

This was merit rule:

Quote

This means merits above what you started with. You can only get this rate if you have the merits when applying

They applied first time on January 26 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2827626.msg28977175#msg28977175 without any merit so this rule doesn't affect them.

Signature campaign was closed following yahoo's message "No response from owners so Im gonna close this campaign. You may remove sig" and also this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2827626.msg29594754#msg29594754 "Campaign is closed for now yes, but they will reopen in a week or less. They have a bug in their tracker and want to fix it before continuing. They are apologizing for the delay in response and hope noone thinks badly. "on February 04 and reopened later - on February 24. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3002004.0;all while OP sent merit on February 9. http://loycevsbasement.privatedns.org/Merit/history/1277719.html

Now, yahoo's feedback says: "alt of preditor422 cheated eroiy campaign "

Did they cheat campaign?