Quote from: hemendrachauhan19 on September 05, 2018, 05:51:53 AM

Quote from: bestcomputerpsycho on September 04, 2018, 06:49:17 PM

Quote from: alexiarhiya on August 31, 2018, 01:49:33 AM

Security tokens are not introduced very commonly till now in the crypto space. There might need a really long time to turn it into a common token, tough some like Poly started introducing themselves. What do you think?

I am bullish on security tokens for longer term. I feel POLY will do to security offerings what ETH done to dApps. I feel when US declares all tokens fall under SEC regulation, it'll create havoc in the current scenario and most of the platforms will be switched to security offerings platform. The only problem I see with POLY is that they are reliant on ETH and so have to deal with there own problems along with the same problem of slow transactions per sec which ETH are already facing.

I also believe that going ahead security tokens is the future and fully agree with you on the part that POLY must have there own blockchain to support faster transactions per second. Also it'll give them the freedom to implement a solution in there preferred manner. I am in there telegram group where many users are saying the same thing but I remember that there CMO replies that by all of your logic "Google should build there own internet".
I like that they have clear idea of what they are going to do going ahead and they have no plans whatsoever of creating another blockchain. Also they have high trust on ETH network and there developers.

Interesting quote that by Polymath's CMO. Ok, so we can clearly see it in a way that POLY is not going to develop it's own blockchain, not in a near future of 2-3 years atleast. After than time will tell if ETH can cope up with the other chains and with security tokens developed on POLY itself.