Quote from: jjiimm_64 on January 15, 2014, 10:32:49 PM

Quote from: cedivad on January 15, 2014, 10:32:04 PM

Icedrill is claiming to have received working prototypes working perfectly in mass, like 5+.

link?

Quote from: will on January 01, 2014, 03:07:38 PM

Quote from: lunarboy on December 31, 2013, 10:03:52 PM

https://twitter.com/HashFast/status/418106414280609793/photo/1

shipping Wink

I can confirm that this exact unit is en-route (via Fedex International Priority) to the IceDrill research/engineering facility where it will undergo rigorous evaluation. ETA: Friday 3 Jan.

Quote from: will on January 02, 2014, 06:29:26 PM

Quote from: Transisto on January 02, 2014, 06:36:21 AM

I've asked for an investor meeting to Willem and Ludvig 3 days ago without any response, Thus ....

I herein would like to invite you, IceDrill / HashFast investors, to a private meeting to discuss the future of IceDrill and our relationship with Hashfast.

Hi All

I've not yet had a chance to discuss it with DT as he's currently in France with sketchy internet.

That said, we wholeheartedly embrace this initiative by Transisto, much more so because it is formed by someone outside the IceDrill team.

My main reason for supporting the idea is that it essentially forms an informal "investor board" which would make my life of investor and information management much easier, to say the least.

To put the requirement of the initiative into perspective, you need to realise that information in the bitcoin mining business is extremely valuable and can loosely be classified into 3 categories:

1. Publically shareable information (the stuff we post here).
2. Information we are unwilling to make public due to it being sensitive and sharing it would potentially be detrimental to the project itself: e.g. see game theory: Nash equilibrium.
3. Information we absolutely cannot share (legal NDAs).

This initiative gives us an outlet for much of #2.

Each of those have different subcategories, and I'd be happy to elaborate further on the dark art of information management in the context of the IceDrill's playbook if anyone's interested.

Anything I missed about those "5+ units" ?