Quote from: willittobe on January 16, 2014, 04:15:32 AM

Quote from: dgross0818 on January 16, 2014, 03:21:52 AM

Quote from: SystmHash on January 16, 2014, 02:49:12 AM

Quote from: willittobe on January 16, 2014, 01:26:40 AM

Hey all. I've been on this pool a long time, haven't compared numbers in quite a while.

However the recent "let's talk about payout" caught my interest, as people reporting .01/mh or even .015/mh are way outperforming me. Like, up to 2x, that is considerable and a little worrying. I'm averaging something like 0.0075/mh.

So I poked around a little.

Here's two different users, for example:

This guy, let's call him Bob, has a steady 19 mh/s or so, and has been around since Dec 16th-
http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/1ACruk5rrJmGTkP7UyyoqGDLNZTHzkqviY.html

And this dude, Let's call him Frank, has slightly less, maybe 18 average, and just started mining on the 7th-
http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/1FxziX77LiZLZxhdXMWREMQVMyjbDmCubw.html

So these are roughly comparable hashrates, with comparable reject ratios, but Frank (the newer, slower miner) is absolutely trouncing Bob on the payouts.

WTF is going on here?
(And yes, I know all the usual explanations, but I don't think any of them actually apply to this specific example)

Bob has a lot more rejected shares

Yes, however, the rejected shares shouldn't matter that much, as "Bob" still had a consistently higher accepted hashrate, yet was making less.

My payout tonight was very very close to 0.01 BTC per MH/s, which puts me in line with "bob"

I've also been around a while, and I'm on the main server, not one of the newer "beta" ones

I think the best explanation is the one already proposed - the smaller servers can more effectively "coin hop" for increased profitability while the older "main" server can pretty much only do LTC, DOGE, and a few others

Of course, others will say that H2O starts siphoning payout for himself after you've been around a while :-P

In order to test the server theory, you should switch all miners to a different address for a day (on same server), then add up the total made in 24 hrs (exchanged + unexchanged + immature) and compare it to what another person (who has been on the server for a while) with a very similar hashrate / rejects made during that same 24 hr period (remember to check the difference in the unexchanged balance as well as the payout)

As long as there's no "leeching" going on, the payouts should be identical...

Now take your miners and point them at one of the beta servers for 24 hours and again record what you made... compare this to the payout of the equal hashpower address and see if they still match.

Yep, I already started a test at the beginning of the payout period: two identical rigs. One rig simply pointed to a new address with no other changes- so still on the main server. The other rig pointed to useast with yet another new address. Both will run the same 24 hour period.

Shall see what comes of it, though as someone else already mentioned, it appears that the coin switching is identical between servers, I watched it for a while.

So, I really have *no idea* what can account for this discrepancy, unless I really am being 'penalized' or 'leeched' for being an "old timer". Will be interesting to see the numbers tomorrow. I really hope there is some other explanation other than being stolen from.

Leave them running more than a day, try a week at least. Good plan though, Can you throw some rigs onto the beta servers? I don't really have identical rigs that I can switch around, there are always differences.