Quote from: d_eddie on September 14, 2018, 05:21:00 PM

Quote from: jbreher on September 14, 2018, 05:11:59 PM

Quote from: kingcolex on September 14, 2018, 04:57:37 PM

Quote from: jbreher on September 14, 2018, 04:51:31 PM

Quote from: kingcolex on September 14, 2018, 06:58:15 AM

Really I wouldn't expect that from you. Bcash was so obviously being propped up by Bitmain, Roger and Craig that I expected nothing to come from it once Bitmain stopped their losses.

I don't much give a damnn what Bitmain, Roger, and Craig do.* For my part, BCH has the properties that made bitcoin great to begin with. Scaling in a logical fashion, and free of the Segwit virus. From my perspective, it is simply technically better than BTC. Hopefully, the world will awaken to this.

* Well, I hope they keep mining it. Though, the DAA allows for drops in hashpower to be relative non events.**

** Unlike BTC, which lacks this safeguard.

I for one much prefer the virus of segwit rather than the cancer or Jihan and Roger. I wouldn't make debatable transaction methods a hill to die on especially with leaders like that.

They are not leaders, so much as fellow travelers.

They each likely own several times the BTC that you own as well. Does this mean you are going to abandon BTC?

Didn't think so.

Some consistency, please.

Here's one of your deft retorical tricks.

haha. Deft rhetorical trick, hunh? No trick. Just a point of argument.

Roger, at least during the pre fork days, and arguably still, may have done more to drive the adoption of bitcoin than anyone else. Jihan is unavoidably the source of the majority of hashpower for both the BCH and the BTC forks. You are unable to impugn BCH for having these people in prominent roles without also impugning BTC. To try to do so is logically invalid.

Quote

You see, it's not about how much BTC or BCH some guys have.

What is this 'it' of which you speak?

Quote

It's more about the BTC/BCH ratio. Or the history behind.

Well, which one?