Quote from: joefox on January 18, 2014, 02:40:45 AM

Quote from: ImmortAlex on January 18, 2014, 02:05:38 AM

Okey, take a look from the other side: it will be greatest anti-PR.
Just imagine: instead of writting code for multisig, devs just create code hacks to emulate multisig. Ugly code hacks.
"Hey, they premied 1 billion coin in code, now they spend coins in code, next time they block your coins in code! Greatest scam in history!!! Do Jean-Luc piss by BCNext's command? Shocked

" (Sorry, Jean-Luc, it is joke

)

This, this, this. I can't believe the hypocrisy of insisting that the community should implement multisig, followed by a ludicrous proposal to FAKE multisig for the sake of coin distribution.

BCNext should eat his own dog food. If he wants to distribute coins this way, he should prioritize the implementation of a Nxt feature that supports its implementation for EVERYONE.

I can accept the anarchic, inconsistent, and schizophrenic method by which bounties and rewards are being distributed, but this implementation of a distribution mechanism is the worst I've heard.

Again: I think the IDEA is great. The specific method of IMPLEMENTATION is stupid. Really stupid.

Frankly, I think the whole idea is just a test, and the fact that so many people are ready to +1 it just because the idea (allegedly) came from BCNext is, IMHO, proof of failure.

I don't mean to malign Nxters. I listened to a Bitcoin podcast today that illustrated that most a Bitcoin adopters are far more ignorant than the average Nxt adopter. But we can do better.

I disagree, BCNext is choosing 10 trusted members of the community to distribute the coins accordingly. In essence he is creating what everyone here has been screaming for, a Nxt foundation. For JLC, he can program 10 new locked accounts as a safeguard, probably a new Nxt feature that will require a different pass code to send. You are right, probably a test of a new feature.