Quote from: dzarmush on January 18, 2014, 04:15:47 AM

Quote from: ImmortAlex on January 18, 2014, 03:56:13 AM

Quote from: msin on January 18, 2014, 03:32:22 AM

I disagree, BCNext is choosing 10 trusted members of the community to distribute the coins accordingly. In essence he is creating what everyone here has been screaming for, a Nxt foundation. For JLC, he can program 10 new locked accounts as a safeguard, probably a new Nxt feature that will require a different pass code to send. You are right, probably a test of a new feature.

What feature community want to test? Centralization? Occam's razor? May I recommend to choose twelve trusted members?

I honour community opinion to create Nxt foundation, but I strongly disagree with this opinion. Especially with option to create foundation inside code.

Ok. What's your proposal?

Same as lyynx:

Quote from: lyynx on January 18, 2014, 05:14:17 AM

if the individuals are trusted, why would the code need to be changed just to accommodate them?

- if BCNext is tired to distribute coins (and I can understand him)
- if BCNext do not trust completely some individuals (note: it's not centralization, I'm talk about individuals, not Nxt foundation)
- if we do not have multisig in near future (what is true innovation)

then let's send this coins to genesis. I'm not kidding, I'm completely serious.