Quote from: vlom on September 17, 2018, 09:42:38 AM

Do you judge post made by a user that has a paid sig differently than a post made by a user without "paid posts"?

See:

Quote from: LoyceV on September 12, 2018, 08:07:07 AM

it depends on the signature campaign. If someone wears a signature advertising some token for an ICO, and gets paid in tokens, I often don't read his post. If I don't read it, he won't receive any Merit for sure.
I know your signature campaign has a strict manager, mine too, but most of the ICO spammers don't care about anything. It's simply not worth reading all the crap that's posted.

Quote from: mocacinno on September 17, 2018, 09:47:42 AM

I already noticed the same thing... Maybe it would be a good idear to generate some statistics in a couple of days and create a list of posts that were given exactly 1 merit AND this 1 merit was needed to stop the demotion of the receivers... That way we could filter trough these posts and neg tag anybody who clearly tried to cheat the system by trading/buying exactly 1 merit....

I remember theymos saying not to tag them for small abuses, and I for sure won't do it.

Quote

As for the proposition of anybody losing 1 merit every x days: i must say i'm against the proposition... What about people that seldomly post? Even if 100% of their posts would be high quality, it would still be probable for them to demote if they didn't forcefully post a couple posts every couple of days...

An easy fix would be to lose 1 Merit each time you go up 100 in Activity.

Quote from: coinlocket$ on September 17, 2018, 10:22:44 AM

This is a great news, maybe 5 merits for jr members are even better, I'm very happy with this change.

If Jr. Member requirements go up by 1 Merit point every 6 months, it will demote the farmers again Cheesy