Quote from: BADecker on September 17, 2018, 10:38:56 PM

Quote from: Astargath on September 17, 2018, 03:58:32 PM

Quote from: BADecker on September 16, 2018, 11:45:55 PM

Quote from: Astargath on September 16, 2018, 06:30:48 PM

Quote from: BADecker on September 16, 2018, 04:04:07 PM

If you are talking about https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1543343.msg45595151#msg45595151...

But at her trial, if the police union stood up for her, 99+% of cops would stand up for her, no matter how guilty she was.

Cool

Stood up for her? Why would anyone do that without evidence? That's how you think trials and judges work? Both parties need to provide the necessary evidence and the judge or judges will provide a sentence. If someone is accused of rape I guess you consider him guilty just because he is accused and everyone should support the other party even though you don't know if it really happened. Again, stop with the idiotic arguments mate, you are not getting anywhere.

Again, the point isn't why anyone would or wouldn't stand up for her. It's what the cops would do. They might not be happy with whatever the police union said and did. But they would follow the police union almost 100%. ISIS follows THEIR union almost 100%, as well. Way more cops. Cops way worse.

Cool

''But they would follow the police union almost 100%'' What does this mean? Follow what exactly? This was a particular cop that is accused of doing something bad. What are you talking about?

This means that cops would formally agree with the police union almost 100%, even if they personally and informally did not agree.

ISIS doesn't have a police union, because they are all their own union. So, they are good by agreeing with themselves.

Cops aren't so good in agreeing with themselves. They are duplicitously bad at the same time:
1. Agreeing with their own police union;
2. Disagreeing with their own police union.

You can trust ISIS to do exactly what they are there for.

You never can tell about cops.

Cops are way worse than ISIS.

Cool

This is badecker's logic:

Let's say you have a group of 2000 people tell you that they are going to murder people.

Then you have a group of 2000 people that do not tell you that but 2 of them go and murder people.

From badeckers logic, the first group is better because they tell you, the second group is worse than the first because they werent supposed to murder anyone.

Crazy.