Quote from: Lauda on September 19, 2018, 04:51:40 AM

Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on September 18, 2018, 09:54:26 PM

I'm not sure why a thread was opened against this specific user but there are tons of similar threads in the Digital Goods/Services sections which offer exact same services. @Op, you should probably check them out and get them tagged as well.

That's a non-argument. At any given point in time, there is an overwhelming amount of users that need to be tagged (but still aren't). If you have free time and are willing to, compile a list and post it here.

You're a joke Lauda, your deflecting and avoiding any real answers has been brought to perfection. There's nothing to compile, all you have to do is type followers in the search bar. Your behavior is outright disgraceful and just shows how you long for authority and power. I'm glad I wasn't around when you were a staff member, that must have been a pain to watch.

Quote from: yogg on September 19, 2018, 08:55:04 AM

Will be my only reply here.

Gambling (and advertising it) isn't considered immoral. Everything is clear, and known in advance. Players expect to lose, some can win.
It's the player with himself only, really. Most (if not all) of crypto-related gambling websites, are provably fair.

Fake followers give a wrong, falsely boosted, picture of the project, and hence this is a deceitful strategy.
This is what crooks do, really. Deceive people. Roll Eyes

It actually is. I don't know where you got that picture, maybe it helps you sleep at night since you also advertise them. The damage gambling does is horrific, maybe you'll learn that someday. Addicts are sick and you are fueling their addiction for a couple of bucks? "He'll gamble anyway" is not a valid argument. It's very possible for an addict to see your signature and relapse, believe it or not, so stop hiding behind statements like those.

Same can be said for drugs, you know what you're doing, nothing is hidden, "it's the player with himself only"? Roll Eyes

See the resemblance?

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on September 19, 2018, 09:35:13 AM

Selling other people's personal details (in this case, their email address), without their knowledge or consent is inherently untrustworthy.

Fake views/likes/upvotes are exactly that - fake. Their only purpose is to deceive other users, which is again inherently untrustworthy.

Other users deserve a warning about this before conducting business with Ludji. The red trust is warranted IMO.

Quote from: Ludji on September 18, 2018, 03:50:56 PM

I really wanted to be a valuable member for your information

You still can be. You are not being banned.

It's called marketing. Every fucking brand in the world has fake followers, but that's wrong it seems. I'm not to be trusted because I run a legit business, never scammed anyone, don't have negative reviews. Sure. What's the point of contributing when a wild DT member can piss on you whenever they want. Should I run an escrow service like Lauda? Should I join a gambling signature campaign if I want to earn money? This forum is a joke, the real cancer here are the power-hungry DT members, who can't stand anyone else with an opinion.

EDIT: Even the mods deleted my question to Lauda and marloboroza in this thread. It seems I stepped on someone toes here.

Here's a thread where a few Hero and Legendary members buy or ask about SMM services: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1937884.0

When will you tag them?