Quote from: bee7 on January 19, 2014, 12:19:29 AM

Quote from: Hippie Tech on January 19, 2014, 12:07:21 AM

Quote from: Nullu on January 18, 2014, 11:59:49 PM

Quote from: Hippie Tech on January 18, 2014, 11:53:43 PM

The LK7 dev claims that the LK7 orphans are actually being stolen.

After seeing both of my GRA blocks orphan earlier, I can't help but wonder if the same problem is happening here.

The ledger should not be editting itself.

How could that happen?

From what I know, nodes can force the blockchain to only accept the blocks and/or transactions they choose. Something like a 51% attack..

@bee7 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=295157.msg4178498#msg4178498

This is a bit different for the PoW/PoS hybrid. While a well connected node with a plenty of the hashing power may win the race in broadcasting its PoW block it can't make the network accept more PoW blocks than the network would accept according to the 12/1 rule. ATM there should be no big coinstake in the malicious hands to influence PoS either.

As I posted today at some moment we even were behind the target - we had 22 PoW blocks out of 326 while expected number is 27.

LK7, GLX, BUK, MPL, COL and others are no different than GRA. Having solo'd them all, its easy for me to see the similarities.

Some have many orphans, some are PoS only... all are very problematic. Copy n paste coins.. period.