Quote from: CoinCube on September 19, 2018, 09:43:30 PM

She is making a life destroying accusation against an individual who by all other accounts has led an impeccable life.

Life destroying??? You certainly have a flair for the dramatic. It is by no means a life destroying accusation. It will not land him in any criminal trouble (for pretty obvious reasons), he won't lose his current bench because of it. MAYBE the accusation costs him his seat on the SC but just being a nom is not a guarantee of a position anyways. This is hardly life destroying...

Quote from: CoinCube on September 19, 2018, 09:43:30 PM

She has offered no concrete evidence other then her word.

Quite untrue, she has offered quite a number of pieces of corroborating evidence outside of her word. You denying them doesn't make them less real.

Quote from: CoinCube on September 19, 2018, 09:43:30 PM

She has so far refused the opportunity to state her accusations in public or in private in front of the US senate which has rearranged its schedule for the sole purpose of hearing from her.

Careful now you're in danger of making more incorrect statements. AFAIK she has stated (a sentiment echoed by anyone else wanting truth...) she would like to wait until the FBI can further investigate the issue before deciding to talk with the senate or not. Gee I mean if you were actually seeking the truth wouldn't you want to have the FBI report on the incident, like after they talked to Judge UNDER OATH and checked out the women in Mexico's story? Or is getting a conservative rammed through the senate more important than allowing US law enforcement to do their job... Oh I forgot the FBI is a Dem honey pot right? LOLOLOL

Why would someone lying WANT the FBI to investigate it? Why would the Republicans want to bypass the process of finding out the truth the best way we can and hold the vote ASAP

Quote from: CoinCube on September 19, 2018, 09:43:30 PM

Furthermore she has a history of political activism for the Democratic Party.

So did Trump whats this have to do with whether or not the women was almost raped...

Quote from: CoinCube on September 19, 2018, 09:43:30 PM

Maybe you are right, however, and a simple accusation alone will be enough to destroy Kavahaugh. That would say a lot about the state of our country today.

This place if full of drama lama's it is far from a simple accusation despite your persistence's otherwise and it will hardly destroy Kavanaugh You simply can't be sure with all the other issues that Murkowski and Harris were voting for him anyways. He just might have been sunk before all of this. He was historically the least popular SCOTUS nominee in American history prior to this allegation...

Quote from: CoinCube on September 19, 2018, 09:43:30 PM

Honestly I don't think this is going to turn out well for the Democrats. Too may people on both sides of the political aisle still value truth, justice, and the presumption of innocence over the exercise of raw power and unprovable allegations.

LOL ya right both sides of the political aisle only care about their side of the aisle don't be so naive. The republicans are trying desperately to stack the SC and the dems are trying desperately to stop that from happening until they can do the stacking... The only reason Murkowski and Collins were thinking of breaking the party line on this vote before is the abortion issue and the importance of that 1 issue to their personal political careers IE the women in their states that voted for them... Otherwise it would have almost surely been a full partly line vote. The dems knew this and targeted those 2 women so hard, you can be sure the republicans were doing the same behind closed doors.