Quote from: cryptohunter on November 22, 2018, 05:02:41 PM

Quote from: bones261 on November 22, 2018, 04:58:12 PM

I agree, I would think a commercial service would not mind that their announcement is being disseminated, even "plagiarized." Isn't that what going "viral" is all about? The only thing that they would have issue with is if the person modified the links to direct to a phishing website or other scam.

Is this what happened there ? or are you just giving an example of what we need to be careful about?

Here is the post that was reported and acted upon.

Quote from: hilariousandco on November 22, 2018, 10:43:54 AM

As above, plagiarism. This was the post that was reported:

Quote from: kraterion on September 18, 2018, 04:40:51 PM

this looks like something like a DPoS chain where, delegates are Provisioners but in this case Blocks generation isn't a delegate's task but there other light nodes doing that. I've yet to understand why is more efficent then a DPoS system

Quote from: yeswepump on September 21, 2018, 01:09:18 PM

I think I saw something similar in Multiversum blockchain project: it looks like something like a DPoS chain where, delegates are Provisioners but in this case Blocks generation isn't a delegate's task but there other light nodes doing that, but I've yet to understand it correctly...

I suppose that it is a nice touch that the OP was more specific as to the project. However, he could have just put together his own words instead of copying someone's post and then modifying it. Even a ftfy quote would have been more appropriate.