Yeah. What cracks me up is how all y'all jumped down the throats of BCH developers for having a core dev discover a bug in a single (of several) Bitcoin Cash implementation, which was also never exploited.
Shoe's on the other door now. #justsayin
What are you talking about? Apparently this is a several years long issue that has ramifications on any forks of bitcoin too. So, it remains a bit unclear about your supposed "gotcha."
So, I don't know where you get off in some high and mighty righteous in any kind of found bug conversation.
It's not meant to be a gotcha, it is meant to be an observation upon double standards.
Yeah, but even if you are making a double standards assertion against bitcoiners, you are making that on kinds of strawman created implications as the ones that I already pointed out in my earlier post , and even HairyBeary posted an additional point with his question about whether a bcash developer had spotted the bug and informed the core developers of such. Of course, you could not answer because so far the spotter of the bug has been anonymous.
I guess you didn't get the memo. The person who discovered and responsibly disclosed this devastating bug was a bcasher.
neener neener neener.
Even if true, that is no slam dunk in your favor... but I would concede that if true, I would have to reconsider a variety of my presumptions about bcashers and the folks who are working on it.
As you likely realize, official sources have shown the report of the bitcoin bug to have come from an anonymous, so you are now in the league of requiring extraordinary evidence for your now extraordinary and
post hoc claim (as hairybeary has also mentioned to you).
If you are able provide such evidence, then we can discuss further what that evidence might mean and if any of our previous presumptions need to be tweaked. Otherwise, I am going to continue to stand by my previous comments, which ultimately proclaims Bcash as a piece of deceptive garbage - and those who work on it or promote it are also teaming up with folks who are engaging in deceptions and attacks on the real deal, aka bitcoin.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
Nothing extraordinary about this claim.
You're looking foolish, BTW.
Your the one who is being disingenuous (which can likely be described as foolish, too), if you supposedly have evidence and you are not sharing it.