Quote from: suchmoon on September 25, 2018, 03:42:49 PM

Quote from: iluvbitcoins on September 25, 2018, 02:59:53 PM

It doesn't matter it's about flat-earth, it starts a bad precedent.

Bullshit. The subject matters and the user's blatant lying matters too. Your attempt to make this into some free speech issue is pathetic. This is a Bitcoin forum, not a "come here to lie without consequences" forum. I'm sure there are places for flat-earthers to discuss their pancakes without repercussions. On this forum however trust matters and it just so happens that a liar got called out as untrustworthy.

Here are some other things you want to avoid "discussing" here:

"$10,000 reward for a Super Hero Legendary Merit Source account and how it relates to Bitcoin"
"$10,000 reward for a plagiarism bot and how it relates to Bitcoin"
"$10,000 reward for running a ponzi ICO and how it relates to Bitcoin"
"$10,000 reward for killing Vod and hiding the body and how it relates to Bitcoin"

I'm sure there is an endless list of idiotic shit that one can frame as a "reward" and then claim to have an "opinion" justifying it. Doesn't mean everybody has to consider such behavior trustworthy.

I will not lie, I haven't read through the entire thread, I skimmed it mostly.
Can you pin-point the reply where he is blatantly lying?
I mean, as in lying, not having a different opinion.

Quote from: Flying Hellfish on September 25, 2018, 04:26:26 PM

Quote from: iluvbitcoins on September 25, 2018, 02:59:53 PM

It doesn't matter it's about flat-earth, it starts a bad precedent.

For some reason people think context doesn't matter when its actually paramount LOL.

You might just be on to something I think we should let scammers remain untagged as well since its their opinion that they are not scamming and limiting their opinions is a violation of free speech as well...

I also don't think we should ban plagiarists since it's there opinion they are not doing anything wrong!

Murders shouldn't be prosecuted (at least any murder who's opinion is they are doing nothing wrong).

The OP is retarded, mentally unbalanced or lying and we as a society are not doing them or ourselves any favours letting him think hes a special snowflake who somehow beat science.

We literally have 1000's of photo's of the fucking earth, simply put even a retard can look at a picture and say round.

No we shouldn't make room for the OP's opinion we should ridicule and laugh his demonstrably retarded ass out of the fucking gene pool.

Reductio ad absurdum.

It's their opinion to scam? Are you high or something?
Copy&pasting isn't an opinion.
Murdering someone makes harm to someone else, it is not an opinion.

Now I can red tag you because you're a

Quote

retard

who doesn't know the definition of an opinion?

Quote

opinion (ə-pĭnˈyən)►

   n.
   A belief or conclusion held with confidence but not substantiated by positive knowledge or proof: "The world is not run by thought, nor by imagination, but by opinion ( Elizabeth Drew).
   n.
   A judgment based on special knowledge and given by an expert: a medical opinion.
   n.
   A judgment or estimation of the merit of a person or thing: has a low opinion of braggarts.

As I said so far, facts don't care about opinions.
So if your opinion is you're innocent what does that have to do with you killing someone?

The same way, him believing the earth is flat doesn't make it flat!
But you should not red tag him because of believing it since he's not doing harm to anyone!
Some time ago people behaved this way to those who claimed the earth was round Wink

Quote from: Lauda on September 25, 2018, 05:35:59 PM

Quote from: Tszunami98 on September 25, 2018, 04:48:49 PM

Really pathetic how the staff and DT members gang up so violently and aggresive on the community for daring to defend someone who they consider a victim of the trust system.

Out of curiosity: Who exactly are you and why are you particularly interested in this particular reputation issue? Outlier names tend to catch my old eye, although I'm not up to date with all the newly active individuals here.

Dunno, he's probably just someone who didn't mismanage 3000BTC.