Quote from: lodyman on September 29, 2018, 04:57:49 PM

Quote from: Diced90 on September 29, 2018, 04:36:54 PM

Challenging someone who is challenging the consensus is the same as supporting the consensus... how can you even argue this? the devs have done the right thing by disqualifying you as you didnt follow the rules. Breaking down the fee distribution is not a challenge... you are again supporting it by saying 1 tau per day for each miner is a great incentive..... you also simply rehashed the sybil issue that was mentioned by multiple people before you..... again violating rule 5 as you were not the first to say it....

- my proposed solution to the same issue (address spam / sybil ) was not like what other people presented so it's a unique argument .
- that question was sarcastic question (that is the opposite of supporting something ) as 1 TAU is too little incentive while 10bln coins is the total supply .

Quote from: Diced90 on September 29, 2018, 04:36:54 PM

Quote from: lodyman on September 29, 2018, 11:27:37 AM

BS : it won't make any of us look cooler if we started name calling which isn't civilized at all .
Name calling is easy
you seem to be not able to read my responses just like how akosipepots didn't read the ongoing white-paper .
i wonder if 2=1 ?
..
if you are out of the game why are you still talking ?! maybe you are akosipepots or akosipepots's friend as the Confirmation bias is obvious here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

Look at the way you debate how can you even be in the running?

since you like posting logical fallacies why not look at your straw man arguments and loaded questions.... you are clearly not of sound mind.

That was clearly a sarcasm loaded note of how you were talking in your previous replies and how non-cevilized your replies was
and i meant to prove that it's easy to use name calling without looking at an evidence like what you did when you called me a cheater

I even ended my reply with this sentence :

Quote from: lodyman on September 29, 2018, 11:27:37 AM

but i don't like name calling so let's not dive into that Wink

maybe you should look again what consensus algorithm means;

"A consensus algorithm is a process in computer science used to achieve agreement on a single data value among distributed processes or systems. Consensus algorithms are designed to achieve reliability in a network involving multiple unreliable nodes."

none of your arguments challenge the way Tau achieves consensus. keep throwing up your straw men. derivatives, cheating and breaking the rules how can you still be arguing you deserve to win?