Quote from: Have_good_times on September 30, 2018, 03:39:58 AM

Goal of this topic :
When we are having local specific merit sources why not board specific ones ?

A little talk about analysis, so before we have to know the meaning of the analysis? analysis: can be categorized as the person responsible for research, planning, recommending the selection of software used by members of the Bitcointalk Forum.
So the main analysis must have expertise: analysis, technical, interpersonal and monderator Forum. The most important thing is to understand the behavior of members of the Bitcointalk Forum and its functions, it can identify the best possibilities and analyze problem solving?

In this case the analysis must carry out the system as follows in order to achieve maximum results,
Example:

1. Interact with members of the Bitcointalk Forum to understand the system / device needs that are used such as: computer CPU etc.

2. Interacting with (administrator) of the Bitcointalk Forum to express what is desired for a software and hardware, Interacting guides the program in the process of developing systems / ways / problems / Merit, so that it remains on track when Doing something about the Bitcointalk Forum.

3. testing the system with either sample data or real data to help bitcointalk members

4. testers Implement new systems / proposed systems? the Bitcointalk Forum will be used. Prepare quality documentation.

Well the point is:
I give Example:

(Expert in the field of analysis Merit):

1. [LoyceV][History:analysis:Merit]

2. [theymos][History:analysis:Merit]

3. [Coin-1][History:analysis:Merit]

4. [John (John K.)][History:analysis:Merit]

5. [mprep][History:analysis:Merit]

6. [Luke-Jr][History:analysis:Merit]

7. [-ck][History:analysis:Merit]

Maybe? can it help you to implement a Merit analysis system on Meta or locally?