Quote from: basil-usa on September 30, 2018, 01:48:29 PM

Quote from: anvelaflora on September 30, 2018, 01:44:49 PM

Quote from: basil-usa on September 30, 2018, 01:41:39 PM

Quote from: anvelaflora on September 30, 2018, 01:38:09 PM

Quote from: basil-usa on September 30, 2018, 01:35:36 PM

This is where Basil is to help Grin

There are the following types of smart contacts:

1. Smart-contracts for an individual transaction between the parties.

2. Smart-contracts for platform partners.

3. Smart-contracts for small transactions.

Crypt-ON open such a smart-contract opened once, and all users of the platform will be able to use it. The main advantage is that at the conclusion of such contracts users will not be charged a Commission for their release, which is especially beneficial for small transactions

The transfer of funds will be carried out to the smart-contract directly, payments through Metamask will be used for the simplicity of operations.

Thanks to smart contracts, you can directly, without intermediaries, enter into transactions, take loans, hire performers and exchange cryptocurrency for money.

You no longer need to rely on someones opinion or trust someones word. Take advantage of innovative technologies!

Thanks a lot Basil! And what do u mean by smart contacts for platform partners? How are they different?

If I am not mistaken, it means that partners will be able to open such a smart contract once and carry out all transactions with customers in it, as in the Ledger. And under different areas of business, separate groups of products can open different smart contracts

I see the point. And Smart contracts for individual transaction is pretty the same or no? Probably you also know that

Not exactly, Anvela. These will be used for essential transactions in large amounts. However, if you specify in the settings that the trade is important, a smart-contract will be automatically released to conduct an individual transaction regardless of the amount, so this is quite a convenient feature to implement

Thank you, Basil. Now I see the point