Quote from: Alone055 on October 02, 2018, 10:06:11 AM

[...] I remember a thread where this guy got a negative trust from a DT member and he was requesting for it to be removed, and in that thread, he posted a picture where there were a group of people sitting on a table and everyone having laptops in front of them, which he said was his team who are always working on bounties.

Yes. It was the remarkable post by The Pharmacist. Seems that the same story with these 200 accs.

Quote from: The Pharmacist on August 24, 2018, 01:57:28 PM

I received a PM today with a typical excuse:

Quote from: djuragan on August 24, 2018, 08:20:04 AM

Hello sir,
I'm representing my friends to appeal about our accounts that you give negative trust due to this post.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4650049.0
I wish to inform you that those accounts not belong to a single person, we are making a community to perform bounty campaign.
Does working on bounty campaign with our own individual account against the rules?
About the those wallet that are connected to each other, we used it to safe the fee of transaction.
Some of our team today (the other member are working at home, at the moment):

here is our website : http://kidoelkempoel.com/index.html
Please kindly reconsider, and please remove the negative trust on our account.
Thank you.

I hear the explanation of what I bolded above a lot. Transaction fees are pretty damn low, so there's really no reason why funds should be pooled--and given that blockchain transactions are the only good way to prove accounts are connected, people shouldn't be doing this.

I'm hardly swayed by this picture, either. It shows a bunch of shitposters sitting around a shitposting table in a shitposting farm. They deserve negative trust just for that. Give me a fucking break. Guaranteed the women here don't care about bitcoin in the least. They got recruited to spam like suicide bombers get recruited by ISIS.