Quote from: OvErLoDe1 on October 04, 2018, 07:04:46 PM

Just quoting an earlier statement. The several months of delay to update the limitation wasn't due to lack of personnel to code rather the devs just waited till the price was in the gutter to take action.

Another BS accusation, come on seriously, you're getting nowhere with this.

Go back to concentrating on SCAM coins, and not blaming us for "doing nothing".

Algo wasn't abused, no proof that whales acquired hashing power illegally, wasn't "several months" before we did anything, and yes, coding was a lack of personnel, which is done by one or two people AT MOST!

Stop with the bs accusations already that actually no one seems to give a flying **** about anyway because everyone else knows how hard we work.

It seems like you enjoy quoting what I have said to bump this thread, so please quote this - "Provide proof please"
[/quote]

Quote from: OvErLoDe1 on September 08, 2018, 11:30:29 AM

With regards to us knowing about the cloud miners, yes we did know about it, but struggled to come up with a solution that was fair and in the best interests of the community. We believe we did come up with that solution, and yes, we will be criticised for the time taken to implement that solution, but it wasn't something that we came to lightly.

If there was no issue with the algo then why was it finally updated after the coin was done crashing. As the statement from above proves it wasn't an issue with personnel, rather its one of those bs gold dust on a piece of shit to hide the fact that its a piece of shit comment. The admin was aware of this manipulation of algo limitation for several months and did nothing to protect his investors interest. I will keep referring to monero dev choosing to do nothing to protect their investors interest with the release of the consumer asic miners.
Again in any sector this guys will be investigated for collusion. As for my bs accusation as you would like to call it, its not meant for you but rather directed at those researching the project. Just want to make sure the negative stuff is also represented on the forefront so they have all the info.

If i was interested in buying this coin i will appreciate if the history was in the forefront, so i would be aware of the characters of individual leading the coin.
I also would be glad if info related to the fact that a malicious acct currently holds 2 millions coins and is ready to dump at any time is on the forefront.
Also would appreciate knowing that an individual who has a hx of negatively impacting the value is the current leader on the volume board and this was giving the time to accumulate and destroy the coin value due to inaction from the dev.

So yeah freedom of speech, something i saw you yelling to someone about on discord. By the way funny you will ban someone for not sugarcoating the bs about devs actions or rather lack of action under the guise that its disruptive on discord but have the nerve to use freedom of speech to support an individual heavily promoting an unknown exchange on discord especially after the fallout with octaex.

Anyway, like i have mentioned before if you have an issue with my post on this thread, then its obviously not mean't for you and you can easily block my account so you don't have to see my post anymore. Take care.