Quote from: tactac on October 05, 2018, 02:13:43 AM

I think it is also possible to distribute Merit in another section.

Merit sources are not bound to merit in specific board, imo, and should not be bound too.

Quote from: hugeblack on October 05, 2018, 03:36:54 AM

unsent points are wasted.

Is that correct? Any statement on this? I'm just curious.
unsent merits get accumulated with the next month's merit. There is nothing like wasted or burnt, IMO. Am I correct?

Quote from: Piggy on October 05, 2018, 04:53:32 AM

i do understand that people sometime get busy in real life and have not much time to read or discover new and meritable posts.

IMO, this should not be the way of +merit a post. Merit sources should be act like normal people/member, I meant they should be usual. Putting extra effort for only +merit posts = a duty which is not the purpose of creating merit sources.

Quote from: CodyAlfaridzi on October 05, 2018, 05:50:44 AM

Correct. Here's an excerpt from merit source page

Quote from: Lutpin on January 25, 2018, 02:33:47 AM

For me (and other sources), it is. My merit page reads
"You are a merit source. The next XXX merit you spend will come from your source rather than your sMerit balance. Merit spent from your source will come back in 30 days. Unused source merit is wasted. It is not allowed for merit sources to sell their merit."

Thank you, buddy. That's what I was looking for.

Quote from: r1s2g3 on October 05, 2018, 05:53:36 AM

You need to understand the difference between Merit, sMerits and source sMerits. We are talking about source sMerits here and they get wasted every month.

Sorry, not a personal attack. I think you have little problem with understanding English. Till now, I have seen two posts from you and from both, I got a feeling like "You didn't read the post on which you have made comment."

I understand the differences between merit, sMerit and ~~merit source~~ source sMerits[?].