Quote from: AngelJoshua on October 07, 2018, 11:18:11 AM

Quote from: Ace44 on October 07, 2018, 10:02:50 AM

Quote from: AngelJoshua on October 06, 2018, 11:42:28 PM

Quote from: Nathan01 on October 06, 2018, 07:30:28 PM

Quote from: nesh1 on October 06, 2018, 10:32:29 AM

Quote from: gee777 on October 06, 2018, 08:09:52 AM

Quote from: RyCriptoC on October 06, 2018, 05:10:20 AM

Quote from: nesh1 on October 05, 2018, 09:09:21 AM

Quote from: Getadaaa on October 05, 2018, 07:46:29 AM

Quote from: chan001 on October 05, 2018, 04:21:29 AM

Quote from: AngelJoshua on October 04, 2018, 11:20:15 AM

Quote from: ibininja on October 04, 2018, 03:16:20 AM

For those who were wondering why Manila and the 3000 cabs. The reason they chose Manila is because of the potential it has and all the taxi drivers signed own their own cabs and are officially registered as cab drivers in the Philippines. They do not sign non official drivers.

That's true. I'm from Manila Philippines and we have a lot of cabs and taxi drivers here that they can hired for their services. Most of us also really like using these kinds of apps like to ubers and other similar companies.

That's really nice to see that Tachain wants to go with only registered drivers. But many other countries also do verification of drivers. So there must be some other benefits as well.

Most platforms use verification, thats alroght, but the rating system of TAChain seems more important to taxi users. I get to choose what taxi driver is the best available while the drivers would take care of the users to get a better rating.

Yes but according to the whitepaper the driver can also rate the passenger and that should be there too as some passengers can really be a pain.

Hope taxi drivers and passengers don't come to. Mutual agreement and give each other good rating. That will be drawbacks of this system.

I mentioned this earlier there might be flaws in the rating system here. I am looking for how they are going to fix this.

I don't think there is any flaws behind it the only one should be if they are rating each other very low, but i think Tachain should confirm the rating first and if it is true then they should give a low rating.

I don't take ratings and rating bodies serious.

Some of this guys don't actually carry out any research, some do it genuinely while others just want to blackmail projects when they refuse to pay some ridiculous amount of fee for ratings

Yeah, That's why sometimes I don't believed on some ratings made by any known or just new people here on some projects because we don't really know if they made it honestly or just for money.

I don't rely on them, it's best to always do the research yourself than go with what is stated by a rating site, most are bounty hunters disguised as a rating site, if you've noticed on some telegram groups, they usually request to chat with the admin in their quest to either seek for tokens to dump or ethereum, so just put them aside, only a selected few are dong the needful

Yeah, It's really better to do our own research to the project instead of relying on those ratings and yes some of the bounty hunters who had some experienced on blogging or reviewing are getting paid by those projects that want some good ratings.

Yea, be responsible for your investment and not rating sites, that's what i keep preaching, it's appalling that some individuals find it hard to go through threads, such as this and ascertain if a project is worth investing or not, i mean, how do you intend to put your hard earned money into something based on just reviews you got from a site