Quote from: Spendulus on October 08, 2018, 11:36:40 AM

Quote from: coins4commies on October 08, 2018, 12:06:16 AM

Quote from: xvdazza on October 07, 2018, 11:38:36 PM

The one who has computational capabilities (i even may say significant capabilities). They are not guaranteed to anyone. And bought on the market with a probability of more than 90%. Also luckers and architects. Besides, Satoshi had a stabilization fund (or i wrong?). Decentralized emission does not guarantee equality.

So the people who have the skills and do the work control the products of their work. That sounds a lot like the socialism to me.

Are you trying to stretch the word socialism to include non-governmental forms of economic sharing?

I don't think that is possible.

Of course its not possible, because voluntary sharing is called charity. Socialism requires the confiscation of private property by force, hence they require the government monopoly on violence to do so.