Quote from: Nathan01 on October 08, 2018, 04:17:25 PM

Quote from: AngelJoshua on October 07, 2018, 09:16:29 PM

Quote from: Nathan01 on October 07, 2018, 08:47:46 PM

Quote from: Kriptos on October 07, 2018, 03:19:03 PM

Quote from: faulerwilli on October 07, 2018, 03:08:44 PM

Quote from: Kinkadeinspired on October 07, 2018, 01:25:27 PM

Quote from: Getadaaa on October 07, 2018, 12:41:14 PM

Quote from: nesh1 on October 05, 2018, 09:09:21 AM

Quote from: Getadaaa on October 05, 2018, 07:46:29 AM

Quote from: chan001 on October 05, 2018, 04:21:29 AM

Quote from: AngelJoshua on October 04, 2018, 11:20:15 AM

Quote from: ibininja on October 04, 2018, 03:16:20 AM

For those who were wondering why Manila and the 3000 cabs. The reason they chose Manila is because of the potential it has and all the taxi drivers signed own their own cabs and are officially registered as cab drivers in the Philippines. They do not sign non official drivers.

That's true. I'm from Manila Philippines and we have a lot of cabs and taxi drivers here that they can hired for their services. Most of us also really like using these kinds of apps like to ubers and other similar companies.

That's really nice to see that Tachain wants to go with only registered drivers. But many other countries also do verification of drivers. So there must be some other benefits as well.

Most platforms use verification, thats alroght, but the rating system of TAChain seems more important to taxi users. I get to choose what taxi driver is the best available while the drivers would take care of the users to get a better rating.

Yes but according to the whitepaper the driver can also rate the passenger and that should be there too as some passengers can really be a pain.

Am lost here and I dont think am the only one. Why would there be a rating for passengers.

I think it has no significance. I understand that we could rate taxi but no the users.

Lol. I understand your point but If the passenger is going to create a profile on the app, then I think a rating system will be needed to allow the drivers know the kind of passenger they are dealing with.

I think that's not a good idea. It can quickly happen that you have a conflict with a driver, because he drives a detour. Then you get a bad rating (the driver, of course) and you already have disadvantages in the next bookings. I am not a friend of such rating systems

Yes I agree with you, I think the passenger rating for it's not quite efficiently, if there are many passengers who have a rating that is not good enough then no driver that wants to take them. I think the assessment is only to be given on the service provider.

The passenger is the one who pays the money right? the passenger is the customer also right? I haven't seen any business that run with the model Tachain is proposing where customers get ratings which serves no purpose IMO

Maybe the passengers and drivers can create different reputations based on what each other put on their. For example the passenger rate ng driver really good and the drivers rate the passenger too. So next time if other drivers or passengers will going to use the service they will see the drivers or passenger reputation from his/her previous used.

\

Still doesn't exactly make sense to me anyways hard as i try to find reasons with it, if its going to work for them i really wish them good luck

Well, in the end everybody have their different opinion. Though I think the Tachain team thought this out carefully. It will be nice to actually get an official response on the subject matter.