Quote from: JoTheKhan on January 22, 2014, 03:14:51 PM

Quote from: kleeck on January 22, 2014, 03:10:05 PM

Quote from: Bitdust on January 22, 2014, 02:57:39 PM

Quote from: zumzero on January 22, 2014, 02:53:10 PM

Is everyone too lazy to look up a cached version of BF to find a shareholder with 232,000 shares in the asset list then?

Who cares? Ken put up a bunch of shares on Crypto-Trade. Shares are shares. Yours are no different from Ukyo's. If push comes to shove, Ken could claim the shares are his. Until he explicitly states that the shares are Ukyo's, this is just more diversionary muppetry.

Is that not what Ken said?

Quote from: kslaughter on January 22, 2014, 01:40:41 PM

We are selling Ukyo shares on Crypto-Trade to recover our losses on Bitfunder.

We will start moving Investors shares to Crypto-Trade within the next 7 days.

If this is the case and Ken is adamant about recouping the loses ( I am completely against selling any of Ukyo's Shares ) then Ken should sell just enough shares to cover the loses. That is it. He/We did not lose 2320 Bitcoins. Apparently we lost like 100ish or 60ish or w/e. So he should sell just enough shares to recover those loses and Ukyo should be able to claim the rest of his shares. Greed has taken a hold of you guys.

My understanding of the situation is that this is a forced sale where Ken would recover his losses and the rest would go to Ukyo and he would distribute it evenly to everyone that is still waiting for BTC from him.

Quote from: MrTeal on January 22, 2014, 03:18:47 PM

Is 2.5W for 1.9GH/s at the chip level, or the estimated draw at the wall?

Most likely chip level