Quote from: Veleor on October 14, 2018, 07:41:55 AM

Could it be considered as proof? Worldcore declares that Ernst&Young has audited company:

Quote from: http://worldcore-review.com/en/2018/05/29/what-rating-gave-the-company-worldcore-global-leader-in-audit-ernst-young/

The figures obtained during the audit are the result of the audit, in which the companys assets were summed up, the available resources and possible future prospects were estimated. A detailed report on the audit can download anyone on the site Worldcore on the link.

Ernst&Young writes the opposite in the report:

Quote from: http://worldcore-review.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/EUPSProvider_EY_Presentation.Ru_.pdf#page=2

Please note that the financial statements of the Company provided to us were not audited and we were neither provided nor had access to audited annual reports or notes to the Companys financial statements.

The accusation was that worldcore lied about E&Y valueing the company at $30Million. They did not lie about that.

Quote

5. Worldcore lies that Ernst&Young has valued the company at $30 million. (Article in English: http://archive.li/sDNrI#selection-617.81-617.245). But in fact, Worldcore wasn't audited.

The accusation is now that they:

(6) lied about an audit.

https://web.archive.org/web/20181014102114/http://worldcore-review.com/en/2018/05/29/what-rating-gave-the-company-worldcore-global-leader-in-audit-ernst-young/

Quote

The figures obtained during the audit are the result of the audit, in which the companys assets were summed up, the available resources and possible future prospects were estimated. A detailed report on the audit can download anyone on the site Worldcore on the link.

It appears that they claimed that they were audited but if your read what they are describing and substitute it with "valuation" it suddenly makes much more sense.

Quote

The figures obtained during the audit are the result of the audit, in which the companys assets were summed up, the available resources and possible future prospects were estimated. A detailed report on the audit can download anyone on the site Worldcore on the link.

Quote

The figures obtained during the valuation are the result of the valuation, in which the companys assets were summed up, the available resources and possible future prospects were estimated. A detailed report on the valuation can download anyone on the site Worldcore on the link.

It still reads like garbled nonsense but it makes more sense using the word "valuation" than using the word "audit".

~~The website that stated it is also not registered to Worldcore and there is nothing to prove that it belongs to them.~~ It could be some incompetent bounty manager that wrote that.

I'm not trying to excuse it but there appears to be more "Laurel and Hardy" to this than outright scam.

(6) lied about an audit. Partly proven: ☑�

Worlcore-review.com The site appears to dedicate itself in a counter FUD / smear campaign. Which is only making it worse for themselves.

https://web.archive.org/web/20181014102114/http://worldcore-review.com/en/2018/05/29/what-rating-gave-the-company-worldcore-global-leader-in-audit-ernst-young/

"the available resources and possible future prospects were estimated." does not describe an audit. It describes a valuation.

I believe this to be a case of "mistranslation", "misunderstanding of terminology" or "incompetence".

So it is proven that it was said. It is unclear exactly the role of the person who said it. There is a strong indication that they did not understand what they were saying was wrong. Anyone reading the actual E&Y report that the article linked to would have discovered that it was not an audit but a valuation.

Who-ever is doing their PR is doing a terrible job. They appear to have taken a very adversarial approach rather than to tackle it logically and systematically.
Most of the "issues" have a logical explanation but their reaction to the accusations makes them look like an angry teenager is running their PR.
I can understand why they would be angry - but their approach is making it worse.

Wordcore-review.com is full of errors and gives a thuggish impression.

It even spells its own name wrong in places.

Like I said: "Laurel and Hardy"