if a user deserves the negative feedback, wouldn't they have received it from more users than just Lauda?
Sometimes that happens, sometimes not. DT members don't have unlimited time to echo feedback left by other DT members, and sometimes DT members don't agree with each other about feedback that's been given. In any case, there are a lot of unsavory characters who now have a clean trust score since Lauda was removed from DT.
I've gotten quite a few PMs already from members I've co-tagged with Lauda, asking me to remove my feedback. They see this as their opportunity to start fresh, but thus far I haven't removed any of my tags. I'm still holding out hope that someone on DT1 will realize that Lauda ought to be put back on DT2--and also that the community will get an explanation as to why Lauda was removed in the first place. It's certainly a good thing that other DT members are reviewing Lauda's tags and re-tagging people, but it would be much better if Lauda was put back on the DT list.
My feedback was on-point pretty much >98% of the time.
Agreed.