Quote from: aliashraf on October 15, 2018, 10:13:08 AM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on October 15, 2018, 07:04:43 AM

Quote from: aliashraf on October 13, 2018, 11:15:40 AM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on October 13, 2018, 07:42:02 AM

What "bigger missions" are you speaking of that would put decentralization on top of its list?

Replacing fiat definitively.

I believe Bitcoin can be a world reserve currency, but taking away the right to print money and seigniorage from the government would be impossible.

As much as using this term, "world reserve currency" is common nowadays, it is nonsense. There is and there would be no such thing ever. Central banks use their reserves among other devices, for manipulating market. It is not what bitcoin and cryptocurrency is about.

I said it more to make a point that Bitcoin will have the same status as the US Dollar as a "world reserve currency". A currency that nations will be willing to hold. Who said they can be stopped if they wanted to?

Quote

Denouncing the possibility of elimination of fiat and gov seigniorage is an ideological argument which as a bitcoiner, I'm not aligned with, neither Satoshi:

Trying to put yourself on the level of Satoshi now are we? Hahaha. I'm joking. Cool

Quote

I don't think politically neutralizing bitcoin by pushing it to whales/central banks territory in the name of "world reserve currency" would help. For this they have Ripple.

If Bitcoin is viewed as something of real value within 50 years, then it will become a world reserve currency in my opinion.

Quote

Quote from: Wind_FURY on October 15, 2018, 07:04:43 AM

Quote

To accomplish this you just can't put all the eggs in a Chinese basket and give it to XI JInping to keep it secure and act rational.

What's the acceptable solution? The problem in Bitcoin is many developers have just discovered it and some of them already propose to "save" it without fully understanding the trade-offs.

The only solution, acceptable or not, is a PoCW hard fork complemented by a 2 way hash algorithm for retiring ASICs in a 2-3 years window as a package.

I would be happy to see you prove to the Core developers that your idea is applicable.

Many developers discovered Bitcoin and claimed they can "fix" it.

Quote

Quote

Quote

Massive adoption of bitcoin raises scalability challenges, but we could just wait for them to actually happen then figure out a solution but it is a process that never gonna boost with the current fragile situation.

What's your opinion on the Lightning Network or a layered topology for Bitcoin in general?

As I said, I think it is too early to be concerned about scalability but generally I think off-chain solutions (LN, side chains, ... ) are not that ultimate that BlockStream suggests and we need on-chain scaling through improvements and sharding as well.

Why would Bitcoin need "sharding"? Bitcoin is already designed to scale out by the regulated the block size cap.

Plus wasn't sharding "invented" by Vitalik Buterin? The same developer that you said we should not lend an ear to?

Quote

Quote

Quote from: Wind_FURY on October 13, 2018, 07:42:02 AM

Quote from: aliashraf on October 13, 2018, 11:15:40 AM

By convenient, I mean forking to an ASIC-resistant algo is both desirable and achievable (incrementally tho) but not very effective and helpful while fixing mining variance and proximity premium flaws and pooling pressure, is the hard job comparatively and the ultimate decentralization solution.

Desirable knowing that you are cutting off hash power and nodes?

No hash power cut-off. Imagine we implant a secondary ASIC-resistant cpu/gpu friendly algo (like ProgPow) and define two parallel difficulty adjustment systems which regulate blocks mined by sha2 at 11 blocks per every 2 hours ratio while gpus are set to generate 1 block in the same window also suppose we use a gradual re-adjustment policy by introducing a decrease/increase strategy for above parameters. See? no cut-off!

How many hard forks will that take?

What would make you so sure that Bitmain will not make new ASICs for the new mining algorithm?

Quote

Quote

When should the community expect a written proposal?

Understanding the need for a hard fork, and not being interested in following bch fate, I have realized that I need to produce a complete package and it is hard job for a lone wolf, not impossible but I need more time. I'm thinking of early 2019 for such a package, like 6 months Wink

Good luck in finding a solution.