Quote from: cheaptar on January 24, 2014, 02:09:20 AM

Quote from: talktopab on January 24, 2014, 12:49:06 AM

Quote from: cheaptar on January 24, 2014, 12:37:58 AM

Quote from: talktopab on January 24, 2014, 12:28:25 AM

Quote from: bitcoin.newsfeed on January 23, 2014, 11:40:06 PM

Quote from: ThickAsThieves on January 23, 2014, 06:17:20 PM

The only shares for sale that have proceeds go directly to Neo, are the ones available at lmb-holdings.com. None of the shares trading on Havelock are being sold by Neo, they are all private shareholders trading on the open market.

I read it again. So when we were buying shares on Havelock via 1st IPVO offering(it was no direct shares offering back then), we were actually buying "TAT NEOBEE PT Shares" which were paid by you before AND are registered as direct shares of LMB Holdings to TATi's official name? Or what is the legal status of shares we're holding? How your accountant firm will be able to legally pay dividends in BTC for anonymous investors? Just curious, how company handle this.

Well, that is the whole thing about bitcoin, anonymity. As long as Neo is transparent with accounting (I trust them so I see no problem on this), the proportional dividends are received via your public address. I do not see any legal implementation needed. All the records are in the blockchain.

Well, the whole thing about being outside of the law is the shit can hit the fan any time. That's partially why some prefer to be on the right side of it.

My point is that bitcoin nature does not need to comply in terms of holding shares of a company and receiving dividends. This is a internal company matter and in a bitcoin company the difference is that you do not need a bank account to receive dividends or buy/sell shares. You are questioning the bitcoin concept rather than how Neo is managing shares and dividends. Other different thing is how the company operations comply with existent law. This for sure needs full compliance.

Well, no. Havelock, an allegedly Panamanian exchange where NeoBee shares are being traded, is an exchange just like BTCT (shut down 'coz law) and BitFunder (ditto), to name the most recent. Trading unregistered securities on an unlicensed exchanges is problematic, regardless of the underlying currency. The law can take away your coin (see WeEx), shut down exchanges (see above), or, as a minimum, complicate things. It should be taken seriously, regardless of obeying it. That's why the original question was asked. Wouldn't you like to know the answer?

I'm wondering if you are one of puppet accounts so loved by some of the well-known trolls here?

I say that because we've been though this before and I can't see any point to dredging it up other than to create a little FUD-storm.

Quote

Wouldn't you like to know the answer?

I get the feeling you're going to tell us?