Quote from: QMCoin on October 18, 2018, 09:49:54 PM

Quote from: Kasperiko on October 18, 2018, 09:30:40 PM

Quote from: QMCoin on October 17, 2018, 09:36:13 PM

Quote from: Kasperiko on October 17, 2018, 09:22:29 PM

On the one hand, not to reward those who did not vote correctly from the point of view of the community; on the other hand, this is too much centralization of power. It turns out that investors who have many assets in portfolios including yours may simply not get anything due to the fact that it is impossible to monitor and participate in all projects.

So far the majority of the people who own MNs are actually enthusiasts of the purpose of the coin!
although there are indeed a whole bunch who are purely in it just for the rewards/investment point of view...hence lowering the threshold of votes required might just be the way to go.

Just to clarify, anyone can submit links - not just MN holders
I assume you meant if investors don't participate in voting?

Exactly. Many investors buy and forget about buying for several months. So I sometimes do it simply. And this is a problem if it turns out those who do not vote but bought will not get anything.

What do you mean?
MN holders always get their share no matter what...so do people who only stake.

Submitting magnet links is a whole different eco-system.
You (anyone, doesn't have to be a mn owner or anything) can submit a link for 1 QMC,
and if it gets voted by mn holders as a good link to quality inforatmion - you get back 5 QMC!
Any average joe can post a link with just 1 QMC.

The majority of links right now were 'donated' by the way (see payout of 1 qmc in exchange for 1 qmc), by a community member who never expected them to get voted but wanted to provide some content

Thanks for the explanation now everything is much clearer. In this case, you are all right and most importantly honestly done. You need to take an example from other companies on the blockchain that they like to do as it is beneficial for the co-founders of the company.