Quote from: xtraelv on October 20, 2018, 09:39:35 PM

Quote from: akarmin on October 20, 2018, 09:23:13 PM

Quote from: Marina Uni on October 19, 2018, 08:59:40 AM

Do you have doubts that the criminal case really exists?

Perhaps you also doubt this decision of the Moscow court?

The Moscow Arbitration Court in the case of the protection of the business reputation of Worldcore (EUPSProvider sr.o.) to the defendant Rusbase refused to meet the requirements in full.

The publication wrote that the project - scam. Worldsore sued the web site. The court recognized that the publication is completely and unconditionally right.

marina, get calm down, please! it's not written in the jugde decision that worldcore is a scam (as you are trying to force), it's written that the moscow arbitration court refused to meet the requirements. and this is the most interesting moment. the fact itself that rusbase deleted the article before the court session could have led to requirements' meeting refusal

In a lot of countries there is a legal defense called "honest opinion". As long as the journalist can show that they based their opinion on information that led to their reasonable opinion at the time they are immune from a defamation lawsuits. However if they receive information to the contrary later that contradicts that and by applying that newly gained knowledge does not lead to a reasonable opinion anymore they have to stop publishing that opinion (in the case of online content) it in order to be eligible for such defense.

exactly! rusbase's lawyers understand this - so, I suppose that was the reason they deleted the article. one more note:
only the operative part of the court session is given. the protocol one is not in the public access, unfortunatelly. let's hope that the representatives of worldcore will post it. it would be interesting to study the arguments.