Quote from: Lauda on October 24, 2018, 05:38:34 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on October 24, 2018, 05:33:02 AM

The above says two things, 1st it explicitly says that the bitcoin would be held in 3AiGej11G8jUXvEBPvQKPLiHXC7ruUCp1Z, and 2nd, it implied that each of the three above escrows would be the sole custodian of one of the three private keys that can spend funds in the above address, requiring two of those keys.

No, it doesn't say that; this is what happens when a butthurt, pathetic scammer is interpreting the situation. That was that investment address; it has nothing to do with where funds were going to be kept.

Quote from: Quickseller on October 24, 2018, 05:33:02 AM

The above is a breach of contract.

There is no contract that implies any such restriction, nor was there any breach of any kind of imaginary contract.

Quote from: Quickseller on October 24, 2018, 05:33:02 AM

-snip-

There are no missing funds. When will you stop being upset that I trampled over your shady account-farming business? It's time to forfeit the lies. Roll Eyes

My analysts and the underlying facts speak for themselves.