Not has no more than 10% of nodes but will have less than 10%. Read carefully please.
I read carefully. You did not understand me a little. I mean, Universa can have 90+% nodes, and no one will know about it. How can I check the fact of no more than 10%? Or just believe the words of the team?
I don't think that this is interesting for Universa first. What for? To control blockchain? What is the purpose of having this majority of nodes? To do what?
Most nodes are control of information stored in a blockchain. And if we are talking about banks or governments, then this is a violation of their security.
There's no reason for us to control all nodes. If we do that and start to control the blockchain that would indeed violate their security. That's why we would never do that. Just think about it. If we do, we would lose all our partners forever. So there's no point for us to do such a thing.
Why do banks have to believe this? They will have to pass into the hands of Borodich information, which is worth millions of dollars. Even if the risk is less than 0.0001%, they will not agree to it.
Of course, besides our words, there would be contracts, which are signed before getting into partnerships. They can also reassure that we don't plan something malicious. But again, there's really no point for us to even try to do something because that will inevitably lead to us being out of business. No one will want to have any connections with us if we try to trick someone.
Another thing to think about is social media and forums. If we indeed will refrain everyone from running a node except us, people will talk about it and express their concerns as to why they haven't received a license. We will not be able to conceal the truth. That's the Internet and the news will spread out before you notice.
The argument: "If we turn out to be villains, then we will not be able to continue our work further," is not an argument for banks. This is not safety evidence. For them, safety is paramount.