Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: What's more important to judge whether or not I should be trusted?
by
Lauda
on 25/10/2018, 14:18:30 UTC
I don't think so.
Just seemed odd to me that iluvbitcoins would control the staked address of an account he is selling which was apparently acquired through a defaulted loan. I don't see any evidence that private keys or staked addresses were typically used as collateral in the past with accounts - as that would be stupid for the account owner.
Cases probably exist, but I haven't seen them often (if at all).

And I guess I don't understand why anyone would accept a loan from an account owner who is handing over their private keys?? (assuming they expect to be paid back)
That doesn't make sense indeed. Even if you repay your loan, your key (thus also your account, at least temporarily) remains compromised.