Quote from: ValeryO on October 25, 2018, 02:42:45 PM

Quote from: genie854 on October 25, 2018, 09:52:50 AM

Quote from: ValeryO on October 25, 2018, 06:18:50 AM

Quote from: genie854 on October 24, 2018, 11:31:48 PM

TAUcoin debate daily topic 10/25/2018

Continuation of reward clipping discussion. Do you think it is fair for a user to gain profit from making transactions? For example, without reward clipping, one can send transactions between his own addresses to increase mining power. This could be profitable if future transaction volume is greater than current.

50/50 or win/win. All fake transaction should be limited in any way. From the other hand transactions that make startups on tau platform or transaction that allow growing up the tau community etc., should be awarded for example in lower fees.

TAU is a permission-less public chain, so it might be difficult to tell which transactions are "fake" and which are "start-up".

"Fake" is a transaction which overfed determined limit (day, month, year).
Startup makes a request to mods. Mods accepted startup account (accounts) and all transactions from it account is "start-up".

Time limit on "fake" transaction won't work if an entity creates lots of addresses (it's free).

Mods (foundation?) can grant "start-up" status, but this is a centralized solution.