Quote from: HonzaIT on October 25, 2018, 10:27:43 PM

Minerpool.net is not for small miners when it's already, so it's good for solo, but it's not heavy on the pool, it's better for other AKA POOLs.
!!!
WHAT you have to get is counting on the number of blocks, total load and hashrate, but the problem is that when you look at the blocks, so much of the solo is so you can not count, but the system does not distinguish them.

Personally, I like that mineralpool offers solo miner, it's better than solo mining, when everyone is in competition, but in the pool are competitors only from other pools.

If you are looking for the opportunity to benefit from the pool, so elsewhere.

*********************************************************************

AKA goes up, so do not let you train :-)

Grin

Over a long enough time to nullify variance, a (true) solo miner and a pool miner should get the exact same amount. But solo mining on a pool is not really solo mining, because you are on a pool, for true solo mining you have to have your own node with your mining address configured on it. Solo mining on pool is just a marketing argument.

And when solo and pool mining are mixed, it's the worst thing for the pool miners which works for the solo miners but didn't get credited for it. And it's also open to exploits, like this miner http://akroma.minerpool.net/#/account/0xb1476f658877ff4a514689303abc2b5add185a44 who is exploiting the pool (get credits for pool and solo blocks) for more than 2 weeks with an ever growing hashrate, leaving only dust to pool miners.

On my pool I'm getting 40~50 AKA/day with 100Mh/s. http://www.akroma.ovh/#/account/0xd829dd76f20d6d004809bd8d68ffca4473c72219 it's more than miners with 500 MH/s on minerpool.
http://www.akroma.ovh/ 0.1% fees

The sadest thing in this (I don't care about miners who blindly leave their rigs running without checking their gains) is it might hurt Akroma reputation...