The desire for maximum decentralization is a reasonable desire. But I do not think that the ownership of any part of the tokens gives the right to vote in the project and the right to somehow manage it.
But if someone owns a large proportion of tokens, then he can control the price. From the point of view of the market model, the token distribution model is most beneficial when there are many small owners.
If the players are active and there are many of them, then the price of the token will be determined by the use of the token in the game, and not by speculation on the exchange. In this case, it does not matter who has what proportion of tokens.