Quote from: timpum on October 29, 2018, 06:38:18 PM

Quote from: ampirebus on October 29, 2018, 03:22:06 PM

Quote from: timpum on October 29, 2018, 02:54:22 PM

Quote from: kspro on October 29, 2018, 12:19:22 PM

Quote from: timpum on October 29, 2018, 12:05:11 PM

Quote from: cryptocreap on October 26, 2018, 11:11:24 AM

How do you know about this? By market? Are you 100% sure that all nodes are going to different hands especially when we are talking about new projects?

We are talking about the network building model. And, in my opinion, a system that anyone can enter is more honest and decentralized. It does not depend on one person.

Agree with you partially, mate. But in those systems anyone can have a majority of nodes especially when you need to make 50+ consensus. When it is 90%+ it is much harder to get control over such a system.

90% + system is undoubtedly more reliable. But I'm not talking about that. I talked about making a decision by a single person. Monarchy say so.

Maybe it is responsibility when you know who makes decision.

Yes, it is a responsibility. But we have already encountered in the cryptocurrency the fact that even famous people say one thing and do another. This problem is very serious.

With all my respect but it looks like you are focused on a problem with is not exists. In "open systems" (with really don't exist) it is easier to get control over. You just take 50% nodes and that's all. No license, no control. If license is given by organization it is controlled and we know who gives license and to whom. In that point it is hard to take control over the system.