Quote from: hihelen on October 30, 2018, 07:47:57 PM

Quote from: ampirebus on October 30, 2018, 02:29:42 PM

Quote from: timpum on October 30, 2018, 12:48:25 PM

Quote from: McInzy on October 30, 2018, 11:50:05 AM

Quote from: timpum on October 29, 2018, 08:44:31 PM

Quote from: cryptocreap on October 29, 2018, 08:02:17 PM

With all my respect but it looks like you are focused on a problem with is not exists. In "open systems" (with really don't exist) it is easier to get control over. You just take 50% nodes and that's all. No license, no control. If license is given by organization it is controlled and we know who gives license and to whom. In that point it is hard to take control over the system.

If the blockchain is large and popular, then taking over the majority is not very easy and very expensive. And if someone has captured 51%+ in the top blockhains, then it is more profitable for these people to continue earning than to sabotage.

Every Blockchain has a starting point. Bitcoin and Ethereum were not popular ones once. However, they are widely used now. Universa, I believe, will be popular in future. So The network will also be trusted. I see no problems here. I think you gave the answer to all your previous questions on your own, my friend. Everything starts some day...

Yes, everything has a beginning. But I still do not like the monarchy. Borodich is not a king.
By the way, why are they still not considering requests for node installations?

But nobody speaks about monarchy. All is about technology and security. And by the way you can apply for node here: https://kb.universa.io/node_owner_central/31

Completely agree. Universa is not a monarchy. You are trying to make discussion just for discussion itself.

Monarchy?

I don't think so. Borodich is just the CEO, not a monarch here.