Quote from: realr0ach on November 03, 2018, 01:10:02 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on November 02, 2018, 11:35:46 PM

From where are you getting the Trace Mayer assertion of $3.5k is possible? Is that a recent statement, and what is the context of such statement?

All the people who claimed I was speaking "fud" when the price was $20k and I said it was going to plummet to $4.2kish and likely stabilize there with a likely flash crash to $3k before it stabilizes are now basically copying my statement word for word except 10 months late.

Get the fuck out of here with your self-serving assertions that you know anything about BTC and it's price performance or that you are some kind of clairvoyant that knows more than other people about BTC's price performance.

Seems pretty obvious that if you are proclaiming that bitcoin is a bubble all the way up from $250 to $20k that sooner or later you are going to be correct.

So, you don't know shit - otherwise you would not have sold all your BTC in the $500 and bought gold and silver with that....

Your failure/refusal to invest in BTC and your hopium about PMs seems to be a shot in the dark of hopium rather than any kind of smartness that you might arguably have deep down on the inside... Cheesy

which probably we need to dig really deep to locate any grain of smartness in your seeming lack of diversification into bitcoin when you seem to know quite a bit about it.

Quote from: realr0ach on November 03, 2018, 01:10:02 AM

This of course assumes bitcoin has to obey some type of general accounting practices and they don't just print a quadrillion tethers out of thin air to make the price do whatever.

Yes.. give some hopeful and narrow explanation for why BTC has been maintaining above $6k for the past 8 months....

Quote from: realr0ach on November 03, 2018, 01:10:02 AM

Am I a buyer at $4k? Nope. Not when the price of metals is this low.

This is called humor. I think that statements like this is why infofront tolerates you hanging around with us in the WO thread because infofront seems to appreciate some of your nonsense humor. He probably cannot stop rolling on the ground from some of your nonsense humor posts, which could be a bit dangerous especially if viewing WO thread on mobile and perhaps NOT in a safe roach viewing space.

Quote from: realr0ach on November 03, 2018, 01:10:02 AM

I mean, they even 'discovered' the national debt is $40 trillion instead of $20 trillion then tried to cover it up under "national security".

You attempting to paint the picture so dire that your wish for Armageddon comes because that is likely one of the ONLY scenarios in which your PMs might become valuable - likely a less than a 1% long shot. Roll Eyes

Quote from: realr0ach on November 03, 2018, 01:10:02 AM

Price of gold with typical 90%+ correlation to US debt should already be $2500ish now. With a $40+ trillion national debt it would be $5000 an ounce gold ($166 an ounce silver in the bull run to 30:1 GSR, unless they peg 15:1 and it's $320 silver).

Good luck with your projections of undervaluation with those anarchic metals, and your investment theory that seems to rely on a kind of Armageddon (maybe could be called Armageddon hopium?)

Quote from: realr0ach on November 03, 2018, 01:10:02 AM

Some random economist talking about his discovery of the govt's "missing" $21 trillion:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4XRbcBz2Z4

Perhaps those facts, if true, might be more relevant to bitcoin than to your dumbass armageddon reliant PM hopium?