Quote from: franky1 on November 04, 2018, 07:10:44 PM

i think you have forgotten the point of bitcoin
you care more about cor trust, than you do about bitcoin security

The reason Bitcoin is secure is because there's a lower resource cost for running a full node with a smaller blockweight than there would be with a larger blockweight. That's why we're doing what we're doing. Of all the blockchains that exist today, this one is the most secure. We're not going to jeopardise that.

Quote from: franky1 on November 04, 2018, 07:10:44 PM

the waiter charged you 4 times more for your main meal because they had to scrape off the dessert from your plate and edited your receipt to show as a more expensive meal without dessert even though the reality is that a dessert was provided to everyone on the table.

The correct analogy would be that those who ordered a dessert get a discount on their meal, whereas you pay the same price you always used to pay before they introduced the dessert menu. If you don't order the dessert, you can't even see it. You can continue eating, blissfully unaware of the existence of dessert if that's what you want. The choice is yours.

Quote from: franky1 on November 04, 2018, 07:10:44 PM

.. stop flip flopping. decide.. consensus is what you want or tyranny

There's no flip flopping, those securing the chain decide what consensus is. They've decided on SegWit. That's not tyranny. Forcing a larger blockweight onto nodes that don't want it is tyranny. Node operators have the option of running code that supports a larger blockweight. If or when they decide to do that, fair enough. We can then have a larger blockweight. But they aren't doing that now. So stop being the guy who thinks they get to order for everyone. You are the lone voice with little-to-no support who, depending on what day it is, wants either EC or a 4mb blockweight that everyone can use. Why is it so difficult for you to comprehend that's not what everyone else wants? At present, ~0.53% of nodes on this network are running clients that advocate larger blocksize/blockweight. 0.53%. And your preferred method of getting people to agree with you appears to be attacking developers and coming up with bizarre tin-foil-hat stories about how certain people control the network. And you wonder why you're not having much success and people think you're being dishonest? Either come up with a sensible and reasonable case that people might actually take seriously, or just wait patiently for people to decide for themselves when the right time is to run code supporting a larger blockweight. You've made your choice. No one is telling you what to run. Why can't you respect everyone else's decision?