Quote from: Passion_ltc on January 26, 2014, 11:26:37 PM

Quote from: ChuckOne on January 26, 2014, 11:22:14 PM

Quote from: Passion_ltc on January 26, 2014, 11:11:49 PM

Quote from: ChuckOne on January 26, 2014, 10:59:53 PM

Quote from: Passion_ltc on January 26, 2014, 08:01:41 PM

Quote from: Komputor on January 26, 2014, 07:31:55 PM

Quote from: Passion_ltc on January 26, 2014, 07:25:48 PM

The more NXT someone has, the more right he has to decide. It's natural. Someone with 50% ownership on a company has a 50% right to decide something..

It's so easy. So why do you fighting over this so much?

I agree too, but this is only under the assumption that large stakeholders will always do things in the best interest of the currency's growth and health. However, I am sure at some point there could be large NXT stakeholders that would vote for something just not acceptable by a majority of the community and it would be interesting to see how that would play out in the actual decision making process.

Well, they are the majority. So let it be.

They're not the majority. That's the point here.

They are. If you have 50$ and the other guy 1$ then you have the majority of wealth. So you are should be allowed to say more.

Fortunately, our democratic systems do not work this way (not yet, I fear).

You should be allowed to say more if you spend more of you wealth:
Say, if you spend 1/10 of your wealth it's more than if somebody spend 1/10000 of theirs. It appears it's not so important to them.

We are not a democratic state. We are an ecosystem based on money. Not on people.

It always come back to people. Not the ecosystem is transferring money. It's people doing so.

An ecosystem which is uncomfortable to people because they feel it is unfair aren't willing to accept it.