Quote from: TheMightyX on January 27, 2014, 12:36:07 AM

This is bullshit

Quote from: sockpuppet_5 on January 26, 2014, 11:43:24 PM

Quote from: utopianfuture on January 26, 2014, 10:47:29 PM

Quote from: sockpuppet_5 on January 26, 2014, 10:11:14 PM

Quote from: sockpuppet_5 on January 26, 2014, 02:14:29 PM

Quote from: utopianfuture on January 26, 2014, 01:50:11 PM

Quote from: sockpuppet_4 on January 26, 2014, 01:46:37 PM

ff455047c6e0403a804ec402a8b2d4f75b46f64d33323b153c7ee5daa2ce2045
0.008btc

I am going to reduce your stakes to one account only if you continue claiming NEM stakes this way.

ok, I will stop. sockpuppet_5 was already posted, sorry. You have specifically allowed multiple claims so I did not think I was doing anything wrong. Too tired to think of groovy forum names today.

But I have not done anything wrong!! This is unfair!! Look at all the accounts with 1 -5 posts in this thread. There are dozens of sockpuppet accounts, just like mine, but you are banning me based on my choice of "account name" - that is acting like a dictator IMO.

The only problem with me is I chose a account names that you don't like, and you ban me!. DICTATOR behaviour. Please reconsider. I am a genuine person interested in NEM. These accounts are for people in my family. I chose names that are easy to remember.

You can't make up the rules as you go along.

Quote from: utopianfuture on January 19, 2014, 03:09:00 AM

No arbitrary rule of distribution. No dictator to tell you how to do things. The most egalitarian coin. Show your love to NEM.

4. How could you prevent multiple buy-ins ?

In short - multiple buy-in is allowed with multiple accounts. We want you to have the ability to buy a NEM stake for your loved ones, your friends so they could all join the movement but the development team reserve the right to refund you the money if an effort to unfairly accumulate NEM stakes is discovered.

My detail explanation and rationales are here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=426303.msg4661493#msg4661493
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=426303.msg4671768#msg4671768

It appears sockpuppet accounts are OK, but we have to conceal them.

Sorry I made that statement too quickly, so when I think about it you are probably right. I posted your case here https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/viewtopic.php?f=58&t=678 . Let's see what the community has to say.

Thank you for reconsidering! I assure you the 5 accounts are for the 5 people in my family.

In retrospect my use of 'sockpuppet' was unnecessarily provocative, but I honestly did not intend that. As long as I've been using forums I've referred to, 2nd and 3rd accounts as 'sockpuppets', and I was very tired when I registered those names, and that's what I called them. They're easy to remember, but I can see it was silly now.

Thanks again for showing flexibility of thought.

I support NEM!

You could have at least attempted to do things fairly by limiting stake to accounts created over a week ago, limiting multiple buy-ins, simple taint analysis (scan address list for duplicates) etc, etc.
Maybe you are only interested in the pledged btc/nxt and not the success of NEM?
At this rate we will have a lot of users with 20-100x stake in NEM at launch. Yes, imagine fairness indeed.

A fair coin is moderated by the people. If you ask the people, no one wants people to be able to buy in multiple times (except those who have bought in multiple times).

Dude if all the accounts are owned by exactly one person per account or a few people opened multiple accounts it makes no difference to your one stake. You will get around 1m, whatever people do that's why its not worth envying others and just be grateful you have this opportunity.