Quote from: BADecker on November 09, 2018, 12:25:13 AM

Quote from: Astargath on November 08, 2018, 08:38:32 PM

Quote from: BADecker on November 08, 2018, 08:11:25 PM

Quote from: Astargath on November 08, 2018, 03:21:34 PM

Quote from: BADecker on November 07, 2018, 10:52:38 PM

Quote from: Astargath on November 07, 2018, 05:49:50 PM

No you didn't never did. Your only ''argument'' was saying that everything here has a cause, which is first of all not true and second of all, not enough to say everything in the universe has a cause. Planet earth is 1 among trillions of other planets, even if you knew the cause of everything here (which you don't) what makes you think everything else also has a cause?

Now you are simply being silly.

How do you know that there are trillions of other planets? That's a big guess, and almost as big of a possibly-faulty extrapolation. Besides, what does trillions of potential planets have to do with everything having a cause? Did you stop worshiping big bang theory, the supposed cause for all the planets and everything else?

Name something that doesn't have a cause. And if you say radioactive decay, don't you realize that radioactive decay wouldn't exist if there wasn't some caused material to cause radioactive decay?

Further, scientifically speaking, it's in the numbers: countless things that have causes, and nothing know or found that is causeless. The odds entirely show that, scientifically speaking, there isn't anything without a cause.

Why do you suddenly want to oppose science? Extend yourself through all space and time and the other dimensions to find something without a cause. Even if you find something out there somewhere, you'll be spread so thin that you'll never make it back to show anybody.

Cool

''Name something that doesn't have a cause'' Prove everything in the universe has a cause first.

'' it's in the numbers: countless things that have causes, and nothing know or found that is causeless. The odds entirely show that, scientifically speaking, there isn't anything without a cause.'' Which was exactly my point, the odds here are not in your favor, you can prove the cause of a few things here in this planet but that's 0.000000000000001% of all the things in the universe, those are not good odds.

Are you actually trying to prove that you can't think straight? When we have 200 billion billion billion causes for things here on earth, but not one thing that exists without a cause, why would you think that there are not many more things out there with causes, and something without a cause? Billions and billions to zero doesn't change. Prove it does by finding one thing that exists without a cause.

Cool

Because if you have a sample of 2 million people and you find 2 of them to have cancer you wouldn't think the rest also have cancer just because 2 of them do, would you?

This is the same, if the universe contains trillions and trillions of different objects but you only know the cause of 0.000000000001% of them, it doesn't logically follow that the rest also need causes. It's statistically just not correct. How do you know different parts of the universe don't have different physical laws? You said that yourself once, seems like you don't remember heh.

Sounds like you like science fiction. Cool

It's quite easy to understand. We know at least this galaxy exists, you might know the cause of everything that is in this planet but there are still hundreds of other planets out there and millions of other objects, how do you know they have a cause?