Quote from: Uniqueorn on January 27, 2014, 09:35:48 PM

Quote from: Passion_ltc on January 27, 2014, 09:26:44 PM

Quote from: ZeroTheGreat on January 27, 2014, 08:51:17 PM

Quote from: Passion_ltc on January 26, 2014, 07:25:48 PM

The more NXT someone has, the more right he has to decide. It's natural.

No, it's not. Wealth =/= Competence.

We are not talking about competence or the correct decision here! We are talking about the RIGHT to be able to vote. And the guys which hold a few thousands are able to vote more than the guys which are holding a few cents!

THIS IS NATURAL! If the votes are resulting in bad decisions, these decisions were made by those who will loose the most. But then, let it be this way..

I actually disagree.
Given the fact that ther are people with 30+ million NXT who paid less for it than someone who buys 10 000 NXT today. Otherwise the top accounts that own 51% (which is like 20 people) can suddenly decide the entire future of NXT.

Quote from: ZeroTheGreat on January 27, 2014, 09:38:26 PM

Quote from: Passion_ltc on January 27, 2014, 09:26:44 PM

We are talking about the RIGHT to be able to vote.

Everyone've right to vote. Even if he've 0 NXT, he can make suggestion to make Nxt stronger. Find a flaw, for example. In decentralized system no one can bound anyone's right to vote.

Quote from: Passion_ltc on January 27, 2014, 09:26:44 PM

And the guys which hold a few thousands are able to vote more than the guys which are holding a few cents!

Disagree. The weights of opinions/suggestions/proposals should be placed by the guys that DO (and decision'll be maked by them as well: coding, installing, buying/selling, anything). Competence! That's right, you can't place your own weight precisely in close to perfect (IMO) system, cos u're living in subjective reality. In science world u've to prove u're right. In social world u've to convince (community) u're right. That's simple.

Quote from: Passion_ltc on January 27, 2014, 09:26:44 PM

THIS IS NATURAL! If the votes are resulting in bad decisions, these decisions were made by those who will loose the most. But then, let it be this way..

Disagree with both statements. It's not natural. It's not OK to build system u expect to fail right away.

I think there are two completely different views on this. The guy who will implement this should just do it how he sees it's correct. If the chain gets a fork we will see which fork will survive.