Quote from: BillieGin on November 17, 2018, 09:31:14 PM

Quote from: BillieGin on November 17, 2018, 09:30:11 PM

Quote from: BillieGin on November 17, 2018, 09:28:29 PM

Quote from: BillieGin on November 17, 2018, 09:25:22 PM

Quote from: Diamond on November 17, 2018, 09:23:44 PM

Quote from: Diamond on November 17, 2018, 09:22:09 PM

Quote from: Diamond on November 17, 2018, 09:20:18 PM

Quote from: BillieGin on November 17, 2018, 09:16:34 PM

Quote from: Diamond on November 17, 2018, 09:06:57 PM

Quote from: BillieGin on November 17, 2018, 09:05:28 PM

Quote from: BillieGin on November 17, 2018, 09:04:59 PM

Quote from: Diamond on November 17, 2018, 09:03:31 PM

Quote from: Diamond on November 17, 2018, 09:01:48 PM

Quote from: BillieGin on November 17, 2018, 08:56:58 PM

Quote from: Diamond on November 17, 2018, 08:51:04 PM

Quote from: BillieGin on November 17, 2018, 08:49:45 PM

Quote from: Diamond on November 17, 2018, 08:47:47 PM

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

But the main electricity in these countries is produced at thermal power plants or at nuclear power plants.

It only says that they are not interested in providing the product and introducing new energy technologies.

Today, thermal power plants consuming a huge batch of coal or natural gas cease to be cost-effective

Nuclear power plants also entail enormous costs in terms of uranium enrichment and the cost of a large number of workers.

But the introduction of new technologies is not cheap.

Also, maintenance of green energy requires the transfer of training of workers and the payment of their labor.

Nevertheless, the cost of implementing green energy by paying off will last for several years.

Why spend a lot of money for new develop, if so much cheaper to maintain in a good working condition existed?

implementation is possible and expensive, but the electricity produced by this environmentally friendly methods is cheaper.

It also doesn't danger the environment.

does not exhaust the earth's resources that are not renewable (coal, gas, oil)

But yet, the wind, solar or wind power plants are not as powerful as traditional power plants

they need enormous unoccupied areas.

Due to the presence of heat, atomic, and hydroelectric power plants, it can further affect the bio-balance of the earth

nobody will destroy the nuclear power plant, in order to build a wind power station in its place, especially since the nuclear power plant will not exceed any other power by its power.

yeah and due to devastating and catastrophic consequences, in the aftermath of the accident at the nuclear power plant also nothing will surpass.