Quote from: mkmdoc on November 23, 2018, 05:39:11 AM

Quote from: paskal_navi on November 22, 2018, 01:58:25 PM

Quote from: gudjhonson on November 22, 2018, 01:41:14 PM

Quote from: lkjhg on November 22, 2018, 01:14:37 PM

Quote from: trader_999 on November 20, 2018, 12:13:56 PM

Quote from: theedm09ka on November 17, 2018, 09:51:02 PM

Quote from: Nold on November 17, 2018, 07:43:11 PM

I have read the plans for the development of GBX, but I do not quite understand what bonuses will rkt token holders have after the introduction of all these ideas?

Please check page 33 of the whitepaper. Actually GBX have a token staking model that allows for a reduction in trading fees. The only thing that the team will not be doing is token burning

is it a only one use case for token? its understandable about burning - can be lead to some legal problems in future in such direction as price manipulation.

if only the GBX token is burned I don't think there is a problem, because GBX has ICO and circulation of course from tokens sold

If the GBX token is not burned, won't that hamper the development of the token itself?
All I know is that ICO burns unsold tokens so that development can be smooth and profitable.

I guess there is a kind of misunderstanding. All tokens have been sold during the original token sale in February. No more tokens should be burned because there was a sold out. And the development of the entire GBX ecosystem goes smoothly and without a break.

There is miss communication because Iconic Holding team canceled the ICO and they burned their crowd sale due to some reasons. GBX will become very exchange and ICO token listing in the coming days because they got approval from their government sectors.

If the BGX token has been registered and has approval from the local government, this means it is an official token and will certainly get protection, so that many will use BGX tokens to trade comfortably.