Quote from: TheQuin on November 24, 2018, 07:19:48 AM

Quote from: docthusinh on November 24, 2018, 04:49:29 AM

Quote from: TheQuin on November 21, 2018, 12:35:04 AM

Quote from: Triple_S on November 20, 2018, 12:25:38 PM

Quote from: TheQuin on November 20, 2018, 08:31:21 AM

Quote from: Kakmakr on November 20, 2018, 06:47:13 AM

It would be nice if you could have a separate "space" to store the coins that we use for gambling and a "space" where you keep the coins for the "income" option. You could offer the users a drop down menu to select the "space" for the different options.

 

I know Freebitco.in can benefit from mistakes like this, so there is no reason why they would invest time into something like this, but it will be a nice feature for the users.    

I stopped using auto-bet, because of this and I think some people might have stopped gambling all together because of previous mistakes like this.

The other failsafe option is to have another account to keep a separate balance for the interest. As long as you don't use it to claim free rolls as well as your main account we don't mind people doing that.

As this is allowed, is it also allowed to refer the one account by the other one to get referral comissions? (Of course using Free Rolls only on one account)

No, that would be abusing the referral system. There is no rule against having 2 accounts but the referral system is meant to reward you for introducing new people to the site, referring yourself obviously doesn't fit into that. It is really just a matter of common sense as what is and isn't abuse.

Please be clear what is and isn't abuse, specific to the following case:
Case 1: User A create 1 main account and another 10 accounts refering himself. Deposit into all of these 11 accounts, play multiply on all accounts get RPs Claim free BTC (Not taking into account overall profit/loss). A specific purpose just to gambling against your site.
Case 2: User B create only 1 account, referring different 10 accounts. User B does not deposit a single satoshi, just play for free and get referrals, other 10 accounts selfdom play, some are depositing and may profit/loss.

I already have been clear that referring yourself is an abuse of the referral system. It is there to reward you for bringing in new customers not to make referral commissions from yourself. So both of your examples are abusive.

I mean for case 2 is another 10 new users, so let say it is a Non abusive.

Bringing new customers which are potentially gamblers that bring profit to you. Abuse of the referral system, yes, but 50% correct. Another 50% can proof that someoone with an insanse bot algo + enough bank roll can shut the shop down to bankruptcy. i.e:

1. With a 10 BTC bankroll, split into 10 accounts and User A kick of the betting bot (which is not abusive as declared in your previous posts). As soon as one of the account get REKTED, his earning from another 9 accounts can be used to backup the other to beat the losing streak, and repeat again. What if all these accounts do not claim hourly FREE BTC but gets what it risked for (betting) to get the Reward Points/ exchange BTC + earned profit from betting? I guess it will be "abusive" answer. So, is this a case where you are scared of?

2. Same as above strategy but this time assume 10 of the closed/best friends/trusted with the referer is the team leader which is User A, collectively join the bankroll of 10 BTC (1BTC each and lending/borrowing/transfer back and forth) to bet against your site, all the BTC transfer around on the blockchain itself to gather up as long as a member need it, when he get a losing streak event. Will all of the friends get banned and get marked as abusive of the system? I guess it should be "abusive" "sometime/anytime" since your site is having a risk of losing against gamblers. If it is a non-abusive, then what are the reason why (1) is abusive and (2) is not abusive, since your potential income is 10BTC each case? Assume that both cases the referer will never get any more user into the system (no more level 2 user).