Quote from: jeliman on November 24, 2018, 06:44:11 AM

1) Masternode network voted to increase DGPS from 10% to 25% of block reward. By doing this, the masternode network voted to give away part of its rewards to the DGPS, where anyone can submit a proposal and participate in the project. Maybe you could also submit one to be the king troll. ;_)>

2) This proves that Crown has a working decentralised community as big holders voted their own rewards down in favor of a decentralized budget to which in fact the biggest holders NEVER submit proposals.

3) More than 400 Masternodes voted YES to the change, while only around 20 voted NO.

4) Release v0.12.5.2 includes "add version number to the wallet build zip files" https://gitlab.crown.tech/crown/crown-core/issues/226
You were one of the first to suggest that this could be a good idea. Thank you for that. Now dont get too excited. Spare us your sermon and go chill out. ;_)>

1, lol u can dance well around the ? like most the crw devs do i see..."If mn system was the dev/crw team mns void of the vote?"
1b, thinking Mn holders ( whome of which of the 400 could hold 25% of the mns and vitoing in rigged deals and that u roll with em not against them shows the crw devs style of crypto play ) and mn held by devs voting on a already broken/proved to be rigged mn vote system
will part of the down fall and shows not decentralized at all.
1c, now if Crw was mn coin from the start you could say 100% of your holder are mn holder but it wasnt and isnt..

1d, There is only 1 crypto troll KING and his name is Valdaz!! im a crypto troll angel from da blockchian ;_)>

2, As said above doesn't prove S & yip the whole time i ran multi mns ( inc some of the 1st crw mn to ever run ) i never put proposals or ask for promo rebate like so called crw promoter got and made ( even when i was a top 10 crw bag holder and even when i was the ONLY promoter of crw for years ).... see i knew the risk of mns and thought the crw dev team esp stonehendge with his decentralize everything slogan wouldnt alow it to go this way & this mn system would be run into the ground with stuff that has happened with crw mns....

3, Ref to answer 1, If lets say devs hold 100+ mns only takes another 50 to vote it in hence why they shouldnt be able to vote.... Do u think CEOs vote to get pay rises nope unless its solo run company, its ALL shareholders not just 1 branch of the shareholders that vote for ceo pay rises... If u cant see the holes in this its not me that needs edmucation on da topic Shocked

ok lets say aswell that alot of other mn run are run by a collective that in there interest not to clean up the system cuz there been raping it for over a year now with rigged and no see threw proposals that the dev team allow and pay them out, why would they shot the people letting them rape?!?! Roll Eyes

( Im still ROFL over the Australian proposal and many of the other full of S proposals put up for vote Roll Eyes

)

4, Advised that years ago btw and that was lil( only took acouple of years to see the light lol), mis labeling POS without the mn in front and no real governance on mn proposal system are BIG issues for CRW but wtf would i know hey Tongue

.

As stated before i know the guy/s that started the hole mn thing and wat bad can come from it if its not governed by smart honest people.

Once again trying to help crw not die from the inside and like the trying to use POS at its not and never will be POS unless ALL holders get pos cuz thats wat it meanz...
But dont name something smart and sexy just cuz i advised to do so and see how it works for ya as it just shows amateur crypto and amateur crypto devs at work there ego to big to take constructive professional advice from some 1 not asking for anything in return like they have since crw 1st days, even when 1 of you other members trys to work to make real name and fix the conflict but nah F him to hey... Roll Eyes

lol. ( i got ya back eddie, chat to ya on topia next time if ya can work out whome i am :_)> )

Da ja
Stabycroc ;_)>